Every app is a stack.
Find yours.

There is no single best stack, it depends on your technical background, timeline, and how much you need the app to scale. Non-technical founders validating an idea quickly are usually best served by no-code tools like Bubble. Founders who need a real native mobile presence typically use React Native or Expo. Founders building a browser-based product usually reach for a web stack like Next.js with Supabase. This tool asks about your specific situation and gives you one clear recommendation instead of a generic list.

No-code tools such as Bubble are the faster and cheaper way to validate an idea, especially if you have no technical background or a limited budget, and they can take a product surprisingly far. Custom code becomes worth the extra time and cost once you need native mobile performance, complex logic, or a product that needs to scale to a large number of users. Many founders start no-code and rebuild in custom code only after the idea is validated.

React Native and Expo are used to build native mobile apps for iOS and Android from one codebase; Expo is a toolchain built on top of React Native that removes most of the native build setup. Next.js is a framework for building web applications that run in a browser, with no app store submission required. The choice depends on where your users need to reach you: an app store icon on their phone, or a link they open in a browser.

No-code builds are generally the cheapest and fastest to get to a working first version. Native mobile apps (React Native/Expo) and web apps (Next.js) cost more because they require an engineer, but they scale further and avoid the platform limitations of no-code tools. Exact cost depends heavily on scope, so this tool focuses on which direction fits your situation rather than a specific price.

For reliable push notifications that reach a phone even when the app is closed, a native app (for example React Native or Expo) is the stronger choice. Browsers can send some notifications, but support is limited and less consistent across devices, especially on iPhone.

Yes. On a web app you typically use a payment provider like Stripe. Inside a native iOS or Android app, Apple and Google usually require their own payment systems for digital goods and subscriptions; a tool like RevenueCat helps you manage both stores from one place.

A mobile game is built in a game engine, not an app framework. Unity and Godot both turn one project into a game for iOS and Android: Unity has the larger library of assets and tutorials, Godot is free, open source and especially good for 2D. Apple's SpriteKit only makes sense if the game is for iPhone and iPad alone. For a game that plays in the browser instead, Phaser (2D) or Three.js (3D) are the usual choices.

In most cases, start with the web app: customers sign up, pay and use the product in the browser, and you can ship changes the same day. Add a mobile app once people need it on the go, for example for notifications, the camera or offline use. Built with React Native and Expo on the same backend as the web app, it shares accounts and data, so people log in once for both. Subscriptions bought inside the iPhone app go through Apple's in-app purchase, and a tool like RevenueCat keeps them in sync with your web billing.